Trump Makes Bold Claims Against Harris and Walz at Montana Rally

Trump Makes Bold Claims Against Harris and Walz at Montana Rally
ASTON, PA - SEPTEMBER 22, 2016: Donald Trump giving the thumbs up gesture as he delivers a campaign speech at Sun Center Studios.

Trump’s recent accusations against Harris and Walz shock the nation while aiming to shift the political landscape.

At a Glance

  • Vice President Kamala Harris and Gov. Tim Walz campaigned in Las Vegas.
  • New polls show Harris leading Trump by four percentage points.
  • Harris’s campaign has been drawing large crowds.
  • Trump criticized Harris and Walz for allegedly falsifying their records.

Trump’s Statements at Montana Rally

At a recent rally in Bozeman, Montana, former President Donald Trump accused Vice President Kamala Harris and Minnesota Governor Tim Walz of fabricating their records to mislead voters. Trump claimed that both Harris and Walz have exaggerated their achievements to win support. This speech is part of a broader strategy to challenge the credibility of his political opponents, urging his followers to scrutinize their records more thoroughly.

Trump did not mince words, branding Governor Walz as “one of the biggest phonies in American politics” and questioning Harris’s accomplishments. His claims included allegations that the Harris-Walz team has fallen short on key issues, particularly concerning immigration and economic policies.

Harris and Walz have been actively campaigning, recently concluding a tour of battleground states with a rally in Las Vegas. According to new polls, Harris is leading Trump by four percentage points in critical states like Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, and Michigan. Harris has also been drawing large crowds, with a notable rally in Glendale, Arizona, that attracted over 15,000 attendees.

Harris and Walz’s Campaigns

The Harris campaign has seen significant support, especially from key organizations. The League of United Latin American Citizens (LULAC) broke its tradition of not endorsing presidential candidates by endorsing Harris. Furthermore, her proposals, such as ending federal income taxes on tips, have garnered bipartisan interest, including support from Trump.

Harris’s campaign has consistently drawn larger crowds compared to President Biden. They have spoken to capacity crowds in multiple states, amassing over 64,000 attendees. In Nevada, where inflation remains a significant issue, Harris has tightened the gap with Trump.

Trump’s Criticisms of Harris and Walz

In his accusations, Trump linked Harris to various immigration issues, citing an incident involving an undocumented immigrant in Bozeman in 2022. Trump also criticized Walz for signing a law requiring menstrual products in public school bathrooms, calling it “far-left legislation.”

Trump urged his supporters to consider these factors when evaluating the credibility and effectiveness of Harris and Walz. His message is clear: scrutinize their records and question their portrayals. By doing so, Trump aims to weaken the support base of his rivals.

Looking ahead, both Harris and Trump have confirmed a debate scheduled for September 10, with Trump agreeing to three debates and Harris open to more. This will provide a critical platform for both candidates to present their arguments directly to the voters.

Future Implications

Trump speculated that President Joe Biden might re-enter the race during the Democratic National Convention, adding another layer of uncertainty to the upcoming election. This speculation, along with Trump’s criticism, aims to destabilize the Harris-Walz campaign while energizing his base.

“When I am president,” Ms. Harris told the Las Vegas crowd, “we will continue our fight for working families of America, including to raise the minimum wage and eliminate taxes on tips for service and hospitality workers.” –

Overall, Trump’s recent speech in Montana reflects his ongoing efforts to undermine his political opponents and energize his base. By accusing Harris and Walz of fabricating their records, he aims to create doubt and encourage a more critical examination of their claims among voters.