Mysterious Limousine Driver Could Blow Case Wide Open

Attorney General Pam Bondi stood firm against Democrat accusations of perjury during a contentious House hearing, exposing yet another partisan attack that relied on an unverified witness claim while ignoring the Trump administration’s unprecedented transparency on Epstein files.

Story Highlights

Rep. Ted Lieu accused AG Bondi of lying under oath about Trump-Epstein evidence, demanding she interview an FBI-tipped witness
Bondi forcefully rejected the perjury claim, stating no evidence exists of Trump committing crimes related to Epstein
DOJ released over 3 million pages of Epstein documents under Trump’s transparency order, despite Democrat claims of cover-up
Every Epstein survivor at the hearing confirmed DOJ never contacted them, raising questions about investigative priorities

Partisan Showdown Over Unverified Witness Claims

Representative Ted Lieu launched a heated attack against Attorney General Pam Bondi during the February 11, 2026 House Judiciary Committee oversight hearing, accusing her of lying under oath about evidence connecting President Trump to Jeffrey Epstein’s crimes. Lieu cited an FBI-tipped witness—reportedly a limousine driver who claimed to overhear Trump on a call with Epstein and knew a girl allegedly involved whose death was ruled suspicious. He demanded the DOJ immediately interview this witness. Bondi firmly responded that no evidence exists of Trump committing any crime and warned Lieu never to accuse her of perjury again.

DOJ Closes Third-Party Probes Amid Transparency Push

The confrontation stems from a July 2025 DOJ memo closing investigations into Epstein’s uncharged third parties, including high-profile figures like Prince Andrew, citing insufficient evidence to predicate further probes. Despite this, the Trump administration ordered the release of over 3 million pages of Epstein-related documents following Congress’s November 2025 Epstein Files Transparency Act. Democrats characterized these actions as a cover-up, while Bondi praised Trump’s commitment to “pure transparency.” The releases faced criticism for missing deadlines by over a month, exposing unredacted victim names, and alleged omissions, fueling bipartisan frustration over investigative thoroughness.

Survivors Left in the Cold by Justice System

Representative Pramila Jayapal spotlighted a disturbing reality during the hearing: every Epstein survivor present raised their hand when asked if the DOJ had contacted them. This revelation underscores systemic failures to prioritize victim justice over political theater. Bondi apologized to survivors, calling Epstein a “monster,” yet confirmed “additional pending investigations” into the Epstein ring without specifying targets. Survivors amplified their demands through a Super Bowl advertisement urging transparency, highlighting their powerlessness amid elite impunity. This neglect contrasts sharply with the DOJ’s revival of cases against Trump critics like James Comey and Letitia James, raising concerns about weaponized justice priorities.

The Real Problem Democrats Won’t Address

Lieu’s accusation hinges on an unverified witness whose claims were submitted as an FBI tip but never corroborated or prosecuted—a glaring gap Democrats exploit for political theater while ignoring their own inaction. The Obama administration held Epstein files for years without transparency, and the Biden DOJ failed to act before Trump ordered releases. The witness’s credibility remains unestablished, yet Lieu weaponizes it to smear the administration despite DOJ confirmation of no active Trump probe. This tactic reflects a broader pattern where Democrats prioritize damaging Trump over genuine accountability for Epstein’s network. Conservatives recognize this charade erodes justice system integrity, transforming survivor advocacy into partisan ammunition while actual predators escape scrutiny.

Bondi’s defiant stance during five hours of testimony reinforces the Trump administration’s refusal to bow to baseless attacks. Her rejection of perjury claims and emphasis on pending investigations signal continued efforts to balance transparency with prosecutorial integrity. Yet the hearing exposed uncomfortable truths: flawed document releases, survivor abandonment, and partisan exploitation of tragedy. For Americans weary of government overreach and political weaponization, this spectacle confirms frustrations about a justice system manipulated for power rather than truth. The Epstein case demands accountability for all involved—not selective outrage designed to protect partisan interests while victims remain forgotten.