Gates ATTACKED From Beyond Grave—Epstein’s Plan

Bill Gates faces renewed scrutiny over his past meetings with convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein following a massive DOJ document release, but claims of “closing in” on the tech billionaire appear rooted in sensationalized narratives rather than evidence of wrongdoing.

Story Snapshot

DOJ released nearly 3 million pages of Epstein documents in late 2024, including an unsent 2013 email draft containing false allegations about Gates
Gates denied all wrongdoing in his first public response, calling Epstein’s claims “absurd and false” while reiterating his regret over the association
Melinda French Gates expressed “unbelievable sadness” over the latest allegations, having previously cited Epstein meetings as a factor in their 2021 divorce
No credible evidence supports claims of “The View” turning on Gates or files “closing in” on criminal charges against the billionaire

Gates Denies Allegations From Unsealed Documents

The Department of Justice unsealed approximately three million pages of Jeffrey Epstein-related documents on a Friday in late 2024. Among these documents was a 2013 draft email written by Epstein containing allegations about Gates that were never sent. Gates addressed these claims in an Australian television interview the following Wednesday, dismissing them as completely fabricated. His spokesperson emphasized that the documents actually demonstrate Epstein’s frustration with Gates for ending their association, revealing the convicted sex offender’s attempts at defamation when his promised philanthropic connections failed to materialize.

The Troubling History Behind Elite Associations

Gates first met Jeffrey Epstein in 2011, three years after Epstein’s 2008 conviction for soliciting prostitution from a minor in Florida. The Microsoft co-founder pursued the relationship based on Epstein’s promises to introduce potential donors for the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation’s global health initiatives. This decision to associate with a known sex offender raises serious questions about judgment among America’s elite class. Gates has repeatedly called these meetings a “huge mistake” and “foolish,” acknowledging that Epstein’s fundraising promises proved to be a complete dead end with no legitimate donors ever materialized.

Melinda Gates’ Warnings Went Unheeded

Melinda French Gates attended one meeting at Epstein’s mansion in 2013 and immediately recognized the danger, later describing him as “evil personified.” She voiced concerns about her then-husband’s association with Epstein from that point forward, according to former Gates Foundation employees. Her instincts proved correct, yet the relationship continued despite her warnings. The Epstein connection became a significant factor in the Gates’ 2021 divorce announcement. Melinda has expressed empathy for Epstein’s victims and stated the meetings gave her nightmares, demonstrating the kind of moral clarity that should have guided decisions from the start.

No Evidence of Criminal Wrongdoing Despite Sensational Headlines

Despite alarming headlines suggesting files are “closing in” on Gates, no evidence in the DOJ document releases indicates criminal wrongdoing or ongoing investigations into the tech billionaire. Gates has consistently denied visiting Epstein’s island or meeting any women through Epstein, and no victim testimony has emerged contradicting these denials. The documents instead reveal Epstein’s failed attempts to leverage the relationship and his anger when Gates ended contact. While Gates’ judgment in associating with a convicted predator deserves condemnation, particularly given his foundation’s focus on helping women and girls globally, conflating poor judgment with criminality serves no one. Americans should demand accountability for elite associations with criminals while maintaining factual accuracy in reporting.

The late 2024 document release has reignited media attention on Gates’ past without producing new legal developments. His foundation continues operating with no reported funding disruptions, though the reputational damage to someone positioning himself as a global health advocate remains significant. The broader issue concerns how America’s billionaire class repeatedly received access to Epstein despite his criminal record, a pattern that undermines public trust in elite institutions and their claimed commitment to protecting vulnerable populations from exploitation.