Black Lives Matter Criticizes Democrats for Anointing Kamala Harris

Black Lives Matter Criticizes Democrats for Anointing Kamala Harris

The news has been abuzz with Kamala Harris’s ascension to the Democratic nomination, a feat she achieved by securing enough delegates to guarantee her victory even before the party’s convention. But not everyone is celebrating. Black Lives Matter, the influential social justice organization, has launched a scathing critique of the Democratic Party’s nomination process, accusing it of betrayal and disregard for democratic principles. Harris’s swift rise to the nomination, achieved through a primarily closed-door process, has sparked outrage among those who demand true accountability and a voice for the people.

The Demand for a Virtual Primary

In response to Harris’s nomination, Black Lives Matter has issued a stern demand to the Democratic National Committee: hold a virtual primary before the convention. This move, they argue, is essential for ensuring that the party’s nominee is chosen through a genuine democratic process. The call came just hours after Vice President Kamala Harris secured enough delegates to win the nomination, casting doubt on the legitimacy of the current nomination method.

“Now, Democratic Party elites and billionaire donors are attempting to manipulate Black voters by anointing Kamala Harris and an unknown vice president as the new Democratic ticket without a primary vote by the public.”

Democratizing the Nomination Process

Black Lives Matter’s call for a virtual primary reflects a long-standing desire to democratize the party’s nominee selection. The historic struggle for a fair and inclusive nomination process has been decades in the making, dating back to the tumultuous conventions of the late 1960s. The virtual primary would provide a more direct voice to the people, ensuring that the party’s nominee represents the collective will of the voting public.

A Time for Accountability

The organization has repeatedly emphasized the need for true democratic accountability, particularly among the Democratic Party. This disillusionment stems from the party’s history of “anointing” nominees without proper democratic due process. The endorsement of Harris, which came swiftly and without a competitive primary, has raised alarms about the integrity of the party’s internal politics.

“This blatant disregard for democratic principles is unacceptable.”

Harris’s Road to the Nomination

Kamala Harris’s rapid rise to the nomination has been marked by a significant groundswell of support from prominent Democratic leaders. Since President Joe Biden’s unexpected withdrawal from the race, Harris has become the favored successor, significantly altering the political landscape. The vice president’s first campaign rally, scheduled for Milwaukee, marks the beginning of a new chapter in the fight against Donald Trump.

Legal Controversies Ahead

As Harris solidifies her position, legal experts predict a flurry of challenges to her nomination, particularly from Republican parties seeking to question the legitimacy of the process. Though these challenges are anticipated, the legal consensus is that they will ultimately be fruitless, as the Democratic Party has significant control over its nominee selection.

The Battle for the Democratic Soul

The Black Lives Matter movement’s fight for accountability is about more than just Kamala Harris—it is about the very essence of democracy. The events unfolding before us represent a critical moment in the history of the Democratic Party. Will they heed the call for democratic reform and true accountability, or will they continue down a path of manipulated, backroom deals?

More from Around the Web:

Americans are taking a closer look at Kamala’s stances:

Democrats seem enthusiastic about Kamala Harris: