Trump General UNLEASHES Iran War Plan — Shock Escalation

A retired three-star general with deep ties to President Trump is urging a full-scale military assault on Iran’s Revolutionary Guard command structure, signaling a dramatic escalation in what insiders are now calling a “mini war” in the Middle East.

Story Snapshot

Retired Lt. Gen. Keith Kellogg calls for targeting Iran’s Revolutionary Guard Corps command and control to “fracture” their power structure
Recent U.S. CENTCOM strikes hit targets in UAE and Oman as Iranian ceasefire teeters on collapse
Kellogg, former Trump National Security Advisor, urges administration to “play all the cards” against Tehran
Iran’s Supreme Leader threatens revenge amid escalating “mini war” despite booming U.S. economy

Targeting the Revolutionary Guard’s Core

Retired Lt. Gen. Keith Kellogg delivered a pointed message on Fox News: the United States should directly target Iran’s Revolutionary Guard Corps command structure to cripple Tehran’s control apparatus. Kellogg, who served as National Security Advisor to Vice President Pence and Special Presidential Envoy for Ukraine until December 2025, told “Rob Schmitt Tonight” that fracturing the IRGC’s leadership would “really compound problems for them” at a moment when Iran appears unable to manage multiple crises. His recommendation reflects decades of military experience and intimate knowledge of how authoritarian regimes maintain power through centralized command.

Escalating Strikes Across the Gulf

U.S. Central Command recently executed strikes in the United Arab Emirates and reportedly hit a residential building in Oman, marking a significant expansion of operations beyond traditional conflict zones. These actions come as a fragile Iranian ceasefire appears on the verge of collapse, with President Trump providing updates on the deteriorating situation. The strikes have affected civilian areas, including Dubai residents, raising questions about collateral impact even as Kellogg argues the U.S. economy continues booming despite what he characterizes as a contained “mini war” against Iranian aggression.

Deep State Elites Push Regime Pressure

Kellogg’s hawkish stance aligns with his post-retirement roles in defense and policy circles, including affiliations with the America First Policy Institute and BGR Group, organizations that benefit from heightened defense spending and interventionist postures. His repeated Fox News appearances urging action against Iran—from “finishing the job” on nuclear threats to warning Tehran that Iran “doesn’t know who he’s dealing with”—raise concerns among Americans tired of endless Middle East entanglements. For citizens across the political spectrum frustrated with government officials prioritizing defense contractor interests over domestic needs, Kellogg’s calls for escalation feel eerily familiar to past conflicts that drained resources while failing to deliver lasting peace.

Historical Precedent and Current Risks

The Revolutionary Guard Corps seized power during Iran’s 1979 Revolution, consolidating control under the Supreme Leader with expanded roles intensifying after 2006. Kellogg’s strategy of decapitating IRGC command targets this historical power center, betting that disrupting their structure will force regime change or capitulation. However, the approach carries significant risks: Iran’s Supreme Leader has already threatened revenge, and broader regional war could destabilize energy markets and drag America into another protracted conflict. While Trump’s leadership receives praise from supporters for projecting strength, critics wonder whether unelected advisors and defense industry insiders are driving policy decisions that could spiral beyond control, leaving ordinary Americans to bear the costs.

The fundamental question remains whether aggressive military action serves genuine national security interests or feeds the perpetual war machine that enriches defense contractors and Washington insiders while American families struggle with inflation and economic insecurity. Kellogg’s decorated military record commands respect, yet his current affiliations and media advocacy suggest motivations beyond pure strategic counsel, echoing patterns that have frustrated voters who elected Trump precisely to challenge such establishment thinking.