Shocking Defamation Ruling: Trump Owes Millions

Blocks spelling appeal with gavel and balance scales

The $83.3 million judgment against Trump has been upheld, challenging notions of presidential immunity.

Story Highlights

A federal appeals court upheld an $83.3 million defamation judgment against Donald Trump.
The court rejected Trump’s arguments of presidential immunity and excessive verdict.
The case stems from E. Jean Carroll’s claims of sexual assault and defamation.
The ruling sets a precedent for future defamation cases involving high-profile figures.

Background of the Case

In 2019, E. Jean Carroll accused then-President Donald Trump of sexually assaulting her in the 1990s. Trump denied these allegations, calling Carroll a liar, which led her to sue him for defamation. The legal battle culminated in a jury verdict in 2024 awarding Carroll $83.3 million. Trump’s appeals, claiming presidential immunity and contesting the damages as excessive, were rejected by the Second Circuit Court of Appeals in June 2025.

Legal Implications and Presidential Immunity

The appellate court’s decision underscores that former presidents are not immune from personal conduct accountability. The court found no merit in Trump’s claims that his statements were protected under presidential immunity. This ruling could serve as a significant precedent, clarifying that the boundaries of presidential immunity do not extend to actions taken outside official duties.

Impact on Defamation Law and Public Figures

The case is among the largest defamation judgments involving a public figure, highlighting the legal risks for defamatory statements. It reflects broader societal shifts in accountability, particularly in the context of the #MeToo movement. Legal experts note that this decision reinforces the ability of the legal system to hold powerful individuals accountable for their statements and actions.

Carroll’s legal team has expressed satisfaction with the ruling, seeing it as a validation of her claims and a step forward for survivors of sexual assault. Trump’s legal team, however, has signaled intentions to pursue further legal avenues, though options are diminishing as the appellate process concludes.